Abstract
The purpose of this study is to contrast some auxiliary hypothesis derived from the titanic Vigotsky’s and Piaget’s approaches, with the aim of revealing a dynamic construction of knowledge uncovered in theory. The study was placed within a framework of the deductive rational epistemological approach. It was characterized as comparative-explanatory, and used the design of many differences as technical and content analysis. It was concluded that the fundamentals of these scientists should be regarded as a significant approach to explain the dynamics of constructing knowledge, as they rescue the dynamic nature and complexity of this human activity.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
